Jan Knudsen
Senior lecturer
Comparing phase sensitive detection and Fourier analysis of modulation excitation spectroscopy data exemplified by Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Author
Summary, in English
Dynamic processes in catalysis are gaining increased attention and could very well be one of the next frontiers in surface science. One way to study such processes is to induce chemical changes on the surface for example by periodically adjusting the (electro)chemical potential in situ and identify the resulting spectral changes. Often this is referred to as Modulation Excitation Spectroscopy (MES). Using Ambient Pressure Photoelectron Spectroscopy data, we here discuss and compare the analysis of MES data using both Phase Sensitive Detection (PSD) and Fourier analysis. We discuss that PSD determines the component magnitude at a user-defined phase value while Fourier analysis provides the maximum oscillation amplitude and respective phase value of oscillating spectral features. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of the different analysis schemes and explore how the full time-evolution can be obtained.
Department/s
- Synchrotron Radiation Research
- LU Profile Area: Light and Materials
- MAX IV Laboratory
- NanoLund: Centre for Nanoscience
- LTH Profile Area: Photon Science and Technology
- LTH Profile Area: Nanoscience and Semiconductor Technology
Publishing year
2025-01
Language
English
Publication/Series
Surface Science
Volume
751
Document type
Journal article
Publisher
Elsevier
Topic
- Atom and Molecular Physics and Optics
Keywords
- Ambient Pressure XPS
- Fourier transform
- Phase sensitive detection
- Time-resolved
Status
Published
ISBN/ISSN/Other
- ISSN: 0039-6028